杨凌农业高新示范区--陕西频道--人民网

3OifO-news 发布时间: 2020-07-11 09:24:14

“湖北福彩精彩十分开奖走势图【UrGU】”Letmebrieflygiveyoufourreasons.

This,then,beingthecase,weseeatoncewhythereisnotmoreself-sacrificeforGod.Thereasonclearlyis,thatthereisawantofthedeepsenseofmercy.ThesacrificeofChristisnotsufficientlyrealised,andtheresultisthattheself-sacrificeiswithheld.Ifearthereisagreatwantofself-sacrificeevenamongthosewhoholdthetruth.Surelytherearemanywhosereligionnevercoststhemanyrealpersonalself-denial.Theypassthroughlifeeasilyandrespectably,butrefermattersmoretotheirp.44owninclinationthantothecallofGod.Theyaremorereadytopayotherstoworkthantoworkthemselves,andarepronetostandalooffromdistastefulservice,if,astheysay,itdoesnotsuitthem;or,astheymightsay,theydonotlikeit.So,again,butfewdenythemselvesingiving,andthoughmanyareliberal,therearefewwhosepersonalcomfortsarereallydiminishedbytheirliberality.Now,whyisthis?andhowisitthatthegreatsalvationhasnotmorepoweroverus?Isitnotthatthesalvationitselfisnotenoughfeltandappreciated?Itistrueofus,asitwasoftheCorinthians,that“weknowthegraceofourLordJesusChrist,who,thoughHewasrich,yetforoursakesbecamepoor,thatwethroughHispovertymightberich.”Butthoughweknowit,wedonotdeeplyfeelit.Itislikepaintlyingonthesurface,butitisnotburntintous,soastobecomepartandparcelofourselves.Everythingmaybecorrect;ourdoctrinescriptural,andourprinciplessound:butneitheronenortheotherhasgonehometotheinmostsoulwithsuchpowerthatwehavelearnedto“countallthingsbutlossfortheexcellencyoftheknowledgeofChristJesusourLord.”Whatisit,then,thatwewant?Whatp.45mustlieattherootofall?Amorepowerfulsenseofmercy,adeeperconvictionofneed,aclearerperceptionofwhatChristhasdoneforus,amorethoroughappreciationofHisperfectsacrifice;andwhenthatisgiven,weshallbebetterabletounderstandtheappeal,— “Ibeseechyoutherefore,brethren,bythemerciesofGod,thatyepresentyourbodiesalivingsacrifice,holy,acceptableuntoGod,whichisyourreasonableservice.”

TheEnd

ThesecondisfromtherubricintheservicefortheVisitationoftheSick,whereweread— “Hereshallthesickpersonbemovedtomakeaspecialconfessionofhissins,ifhefeelhisconsciencetroubledwithanyweightymatter.”

Letmebrieflygiveyoufourreasons.

Onethingisperfectlyclear.Itisnotdonebytheofferingofanyfreshsacrifice.ThiswasthechiefdutyoftheJewishpriests,butitformsnopartofthatoftheChristianminister.FromoneendoftheNewTestamenttothep.56otheryoucanfindnoallusiontoanysuchthingasaChristiansacrificeforsin.TheonesacrificeoftheLordJesusChristwasonceandforever,final,complete,andsufficientforallthesinsofthewholeworld.Theworkofsacrificeisfinished,aswearetaughtinthewords,“Towit,thatGodwasinChristreconcilingtheworlduntohimself;”andiftherecanbenosacrifice,itisperfectlyplainthattherecanbenosacrificingpriest.NorcantheideabegatheredfromthePrayer-bookanymorethanitcanfromtheNewTestament.Thereisnotanallusionthere,eithertoasacrificeorasacrificingpriest,exceptwhereitsays,inArt.xxxi.,“Thesacrificesofmasses,inthewhichitwascommonlysaidthatthepriestdidofferChristforthequickandthedead,tohaveremissionofpainorguilt,wereblasphemousfablesanddangerousdeceits.”ThereisnoChristiansacrificerecognisedbytheChurchofEnglandbutthethankfuldedicationofheartandlifeonthepartofthosewhohavebeensavedbythesacrificeoftheLord.Butthissacrificerequiresnopriesttoofferit.Itmayriseatanymoment,andfromanyplace,fromthedepthsofanythankfulheart.Thus,accordingtoourCommunionService,allofferp.57ittogether,andthewholecongregationhavingtogethermetaroundtheirFather’stable,andtogethertastedthejoysoftheirFather’slove,togetherbringtheirsacrifice,andsay,“Hereweofferandpresentuntothee,OLord,ourselves,oursoulsandbodies,tobeareasonable,holy,andlivingsacrificeuntothee.”

Weliveinveryanxioustimes.Differentphasesoferrorarefollowingeachotherwithgreatrapidity,likewavesbeforethegaleonastormysea.Averyshorttimeagoweweredeeplydistressedbythescepticaltendenciesofcertainablewriters,—tendenciesstillinrapidprogress,thoughpublicattentionhasbeenrecentlydirectedintoanotherchannel.NowwearestartledbytheopendeclarationofRomishdoctrine,andopenpracticeofRomishceremonial,bymenwhohaveacceptedofficeinachurchwhichdeclarestheseverydoctrinestobe“blasphemousfablesanddangerousdeceits.”Ithasbecome,therefore,absolutelynecessarythatwep.4shouldunderstandthereasonswhytheChurchofEnglandhasseparatedfromthatofRome,andwhyitisthatweraiseourvoiceagainsttheseinnovations.Iamwellawarethatsuchasubjectisdistastefultomanyminds.Someshrinkfromthetroubleofcontroversy,andwouldratherhavetheirwholeattentionfixedonthatwhichtheyfindhelpfultotheirownsouls.Othersthinkituncharitable;andmaintainthat,providedapersonbeconscientiousinhispractice,weneedfeelnoanxietyaboutthetruthorerrorofhiscreed.ButIampersuadedthatitwillnotdosotodealwithtruth.Thesearedaysinwhichwemustknowwhatwebelieve,andwhywebelieveit.Ifwedesiretostandfast,wemustknowourstanding-ground.AndifwedesiretoseeouryoungpeoplegrowingupaswitnessesfortheLordJesusChrist,wemustnotmerelystrivetocallforthinthemareligionoffeeling,butmusttraintheminsoundScripturalprinciples,thattheymaybeabletogiveananswertoeveryonewhoaskeththemareasonofthehopethatisinthem.TheRomishquestionisforceduponusbytheenormouseffortswhichtheChurchofRomeismakingfortherecoveryofitsancientsupremacyinEngland;andImustsay,andsayitwiththep.5deepestgriefandhumiliation,Ifearwehavebeenbetrayed,inmanycases,bymenwho,asclergymenoftheChurchofEngland,havepledgedthemselvestotheveryprinciplestheyarebetraying.Itishightime,therefore,thatweshouldunderstandthegroundofoursolemnprotestagainstRome,andthatweshouldnotmerelystudytruthinitssimplicity,butstudyitlikewiseinitsoppositiontoRomisherror.Ipurpose,however,Godhelpingme,todirectyourthoughtsthismorningtoonepointofthecontroversy.Icannotattemptthemanypointsonwhichweareatissue.Iconfinemyself,therefore,toone;andthatis,theteachingofthewordofGodwithreferencetoourexaltedSaviour,inoppositiontotheteachingofRomeinthedoctrineoftransubstantiation.MaytheLorddirectourstudies,andwriteHisowntruthmostdeeplyonourhearts!

II.Such,then,isthecontrast;andnowletusturn,inthesecondplace,tothereasonofit.Whywerethoseancientsacrificessooftenrepeated?andwhywasoursonceandforever?Thesamepassagethatbringsoutthecontrastexplainsthereasonofit;andthereasonisthat,p.24inthemselves,theyhavenosavingpower,andthatourshas.Theywereineffectualfortheblottingoutofsin,buttheoneofferingofourBlessedLordwasperfectlyeffectualintheverypointwheretheyfailed.Therewasasgreatacontrastinrespectofefficiencyastherewasinrespectoffrequency;and,infact,therepetitionwastheresultofweakness,astheonenesswastheresultofcompletesufficiency.Thisinsufficiencyisplacedintwopointsofviewinthechapter,forwearetheretaught,first,thatthesesacrificescouldnottakeawaysin,and,secondly,thattheycouldnotsatisfytheconscience.

THEMASS.

Now,suchadoctrineseemstomesoutterlycontrarytoallthatwearetaughtintheScripturesrespectingtheperfectionandconsequentonenessoftheoneofferingofourBlessedLordupontheCross,thatIamutterlyunabletocomprehendhowanypersonwhotakestheScripturesastheirauthoritycan,byanyprocessofmind,bebroughttobelieveit.AsIhavealreadysaid,thesechaptersseemtohavebeenwrittenwithapropheticreferencetoit;andIdonothesitatetoexpressmyfirmandfixedconviction,thatifwemeantoabidebyGod’swordasourguide,wemustprotestagainstthewholemovement.Normustweallowourselvestobeledawaybythereligiousfeelingsofpiousandearnestmen;orpermittheholyreverencewithwhich,asbelievingcommunicants,p.30weregardtheholycommunionofthebodyandbloodofChrist,toinduceustothinklightlyofadeadlyerror,eventhoughmenmakeuseofitinorder,apparently,toexaltthepeculiarsanctityofthesacrament.WemuststandfirmtothegreatprincipleofScripture;theprincipleforwhichourmartyredReformersdidnothesitatetoshedtheirlife-blood,thatthebreadisbread,andthewinewine,afterconsecration,justastheywerebeforeit;thatneithertheonenortheotherischangedintotheLordJesusChrist;thattheLordJesusChristisnotsacrificedinthesacrament;andthattherenevercanbe,solongastheworldlasts,anyfurthersacrificeforsin.WhentheLordJesusChristdiedonthecross,tousethelanguageofourChurch,He“madethere(byHisoneoblationofHimselfonceoffered)afull,perfect,andsufficientsacrifice,oblation,andsatisfaction,forthesinsofthewholeworld:”and,unlesswearepreparedtodenythesufficiencyoftheonecompleteatonement,wemustsetourfacewithaholydeterminationagainstallideasofrepetition,orperpetuation,ofanypropitiatorysacrificeforsin.

Butthisministryofthewordofreconciliationwillvaryaccordingtocircumstances.

1.Thewordsthemselvesprovethattheyarefigurative.Turnto1Cor.xi.25,whereweread:“Thiscupisthenewtestamentinmyblood.”Isthereanyoneblindenoughtosupposethatthecupwaschangedintothenewtestament?Thewordsmustmeanthatthecupwasanemblemofthecovenant.WhenourLordsaid,“Iamthevine,” “Iamthedoor,” “Iamthebreadoflife,”HedidnotmeanthatHewaschangedintoavine,intoadoor,orintobread,butthatallthesethingswereemblemsofHiswork.SoHesaysofthecup,thatitisanemblemofthecovenant;andifwewouldbeconsistentinterpreters,wemustbelievealsoofthebreadthatitwasdeclaredtobeanemblemofthebody.

HowgloriouslydifferentistheonesacrificeoftheSonofGod!It,anditalone,wassufficientforallthesinsofthewholeworld.ThesubstitutionoftheSonofGodforthesinnersatisfiedthewholelaw,andclearedawaythewholecurse.ItnotonlyinGod’scounselsremovedtheguilt,butitreachestheverydepthsofthehumanheart,andgivespeacetotheconsciencewoundedforsin.Observethewordsinix.13,14,ascontrastedwiththoseinx.2.Inx.2wearetaught,thatifthosesacrificescouldhavepurgedtheconscience,theywouldhaveceased.Butinix.14weread,thatthroughthesacrificeofourblessedLord,thisverythingisdone;fortheApostlesays:— “HowmuchmoreshallthebloodofChrist,whothroughtheEternalSpiritofferedHimselfwithoutspottoGod,purgeyourconsciencefromdeadworkstoservethelivingGod?”Theonesacrificewaseffectivetopurgetheconscience;whileallthewholemultitudeofoften-repeatedofferingslefttheconsciencejustp.27whereitwas;withoutrest,withoutpeace,withoutanyrealsatisfaction,underthepainfulpressureofadeeply-feltsin.Letusneverforgetthisgreatresult;foritshowsthatwehavethatwhichtheJew,inhissacrificestakenalone,couldneverhave—aconscienceatrest,aconsciencesetfree,becauseallsinisblottedoutforever;aconsciencereleasedfromitsburden,becausetheLordJesusChrist,theSonofGod,wasadivinely-appointedsubstituteforguilt.

文章推荐:

能源环保--山东频道--人民网

“全民国家安全教育日”重庆武警官兵在行动

李黎明:东作红木文化的倡导者

内蒙古自治区科协--内蒙古频道--人民网

“威马逊”或将成41年来登陆华南最强台风[图]

10名罗城“店小二”上岗服务 汨罗七大举措优化营商环境

主持人资料库――撒贝宁

网友评论

  • 雨花郡主ktO5O

    ButIdonotdenythatthetextisoneofconsiderabledifficulty.Thefirstgreatdifficultyistoascertaintowhomthewordswerespoken.FromLuke,xxiv.33,wefindthatthepersonspresentwere“theeleven,andthemthatwerewiththem;”andthereisnothingintherecordtodecidewhetherthewordswereaddressedtotheelevenApostlesseparately,ortothewholecompany—including,ofcourse,laymenandwomen.Myownbeliefis,thattheywereaddressedtotheelevenseparately,andconveyedaspecialjudicialpowertotheseinspiredmen.Thattheypossessedsuchapowerp.59isclearfromhistory;forwhenPeterretainedthesinofAnaniasandSapphira,Godratifiedhisdecisionbytheirdeath;andwhenSt.PaulpassedsentenceontheincestuouspersonatCorinth,heclearlyclaimedasupernaturalpowerofjudgmentwhenhesaid(1Cor.v.3-5),“ForIverily,asabsentinbodybutpresentinspirit,havejudgedalready,asthoughIwerepresent,concerninghimthathathsodonethisdeed.InthenameofourLordJesusChrist,whenyearegatheredtogether,andmyspirit,withthepowerofourLordJesusChrist,todeliversuchanoneuntoSatanforthedestructionoftheflesh,thatthespiritmaybesavedinthedayoftheLordJesus.”Sowhenheremittedthesamesentenceheclearlyclaimedspecialrighttodoso;ashesaid,“IfIforgaveanything,towhomIforgaveit,foryoursakesforgaveIit,inthepersonofChrist.”Butifthiswerethecase,andifthepowerwasgiventotheApostlesasapartoftheirapostolicoffice,itfollowsthatwiththeApostlesitmusthaveceasedforever.Accordingly,inourLord’swordsthereisnotthesmallesthintattransmission;andasfortheideathattheApostlescouldtransmitittotheBishops,andtheBishopstothePresbyters,itisaltogetherwithoutfoundationp.60inthewordofGod.Infact,thecaseoftheCorinthiansprovesclearlythatitwasnotsotransmitted.Therecannotbeadoubt,thatwhentheepistlewaswrittentherewerePresbytersintheChurchofCorinth;anditisclearthatTitushadjustbeenthereonaspecialmission,forheitwaswhobroughttoSt.PaulthetidingsoftherepentanceoftheCorinthians(2Cor.vii.6,7,andxii.17,18).Butyetnoneofthesepersonsappeartohavehadatransmittedpower.ItwasnecessarytoreferthecasetoSt.Paulhimself.Heretainedandheremitted;andhedidboth“inthepersonofChrist.”

     

  • 雪灵芝nMZDc

    SimplytoThycrossIcling.”

  • 如萱紫儿cAKSI

  • 但法国vxEvC

     

  • 大笨蛋7qVnv

    v

  • 扒皮成MK2VH

    Theycouldnever,therefore,satisfytheconscience;asyouread,Heb;x.1,2:— “Forthelaw,havingashadowofgoodthingstocome,andnottheveryimageofthethings,canneverwiththosesacrificeswhichtheyofferedyearbyyearcontinuallymakethecomersthereuntoperfect.Forthenwouldtheynothaveceasedtobeoffered?becausethattheworshippersoncepurgedshallhavehadnomoreconscienceofsins.”

     Again:itisnottheofficeoftheministertoforgivesins.IfourLord,inHiswordsofJohnxx.23,hadreallyconnectedsuchapowerwiththeministryofreconciliation,itismostextraordinarythatinallthemanyportionsoftheNewTestamentwhichrelatetotheministrythereisnoallusiontoit.TherearethreewholeEpistlesdirectedexclusivelytothechiefpastorsoftheChurch,besidesseveraladdressestopresbytersbothintheActsandEpistles;andisitnotamostremarkablefact,thatthereisnotasingleallusioninanyoneofthesepassagesorepistlestotheforgivenessofsins,asformingaportionoftheministryofreconciliation?Therearefulldirectionsrespectingpreaching,praying,reproving,instructing,andbehaviourtoallthedifferentclassesoftheflock,butofforgivenessofsinbytheminister,notonewordcanyoufindanywhere;andyetforgivenessitselfisthegreatsubjectofthep.58wholeNewTestament.Butitisalwaystracedatonce,withoutanyintermediatemediation,totheLordHimself.ItisalwaysascribedtoHisblood,Hisredemption,andHisgrace,andisneveronceconnectedinanywaywithanypowerofforgivenessbestowedbyapriest.Iamnotnowdwellingonanyoneparticularpassage,butratherontheomissionofthewholesubjectfromthewordofGod;andIcannotbutthinkthatthatomissionisaproof,beyondcontradiction,thattheApostles,writingbyinspiration,didnotunderstandourLordasteachinginthesewordsthattheforgivenessofsinbyapriestformedanypartoftheministryofreconciliation.

  • 草莓果3100d

     

  • 绿卡纸R5Jop

    Forthedecisionofthispoint,letuscomparethe18thand19thverses.Inv.18weread,— “Godhathgiventoustheministryofreconciliation.”Butinv.19thereisaslightvariation;butoneofgreatimportanceintheexpositionofthepassage;forwetherefind— “Hathcommittedtousthewordofreconciliation.”Thewordofreconciliation,therefore,isthesubstanceoftheministry:thegrandworkistomakeknowntheperfectreconciliationwroughtoutforusinChristJesus,toactontheexamplesetusbySt.Paulhimself,whenheburstoutinthegrandappealwhichfollows,andsaid,— “Now,then,weareambassadorsforChrist.AsthoughGoddidbeseechyoubyus,weprayp.63youinChrist’sstead,beyereconcileduntoGod.”

     

标签列表