自治区高院下发通知为全区重点工作提供司法保障

6RL1d-news 发布时间: 2020-07-16 08:47:33

“腾讯分分计划破解版【注册大礼】”

66

Inreality,Stoicismwasnot,liketheolderGreekphilosophies,acreationofindividualgenius.Itbearsthecharacterofacompilationbothonitsfirstexpositionandonitsfinalcompletion.Polemo,whohadbeenafinegentlemanbeforehebecameaphilosopher,tauntedZenowithfilchinghisopinionsfromeveryquarter,likethecunninglittlePhoeniciantraderthathewas.18AnditwassaidthatthesevenhundredtreatisesofChrysippuswouldbereducedtoablankifeverythingthathehadborrowedfromothersweretobeerased.Heseems,indeed,tohavebeenthefatherofreview-writers,andtohaveusedthereviewer’srightoftranscriptionwithmorethanmodernlicense.NearlyawholetragedyofEuripidesreappearedinoneofhis‘articles,’andawitonbeingaskedwhathewasreading,replied,‘theMedeaofChrysippus.’19

Norwasthisall.Thought,afterhaving,asitwouldseem,wanderedawayfromrealityinsearchofemptyabstractions,bythehelpofthoseveryabstractionsregainedpossessionofconcreteexistence,andacquiredafarfullerintelligenceofitscomplexmanifestations.For,eachindividualcharacterisanassemblageofqualities,andcanonlybeunderstoodwhenthosequalities,afterhavingbeenseparatelystudied,arefinallyrecombined.Thus,biographyisaverylateproductionofliterature,andalthoughbiographiesarethefavouritereadingofthosewhomostdespisephilosophy,theycouldneverhavebeenwrittenwithoutitshelp.Moreover,beforecharacterscanbedescribedtheymustexist.Now,itispartlyphilosophywhichcallscharacterintoexistencebysedulousinculcationofself-knowledgeandself-culture,byconsolidatingaman’sindividualityintosomethingindependentofcircumstances,sothatitcomestoform,notafigureinbas-relief,butwhatsculptorscallafigureintheround.SuchwasSocrateshimself,andsuchwerethefigureswhichhetaughtXenophonandPlatotorecogniseandportray.Character-drawingbeginswiththem,andtheMemorabiliainparticularistheearliestattemptatabiographicalanalysisthatwepossess.FromthistoPlutarch’sLivestherewasstillalongjourneytobeaccomplished,buttheintervalbetweenthemislessconsiderablethanthatwhichdividesXenophonfromhisimmediatepredecessor,Thucydides.AndwhenwerememberhowintimatelythesubstanceofChristianteachingisconnectedwiththeliteraryformofitsfirstrecord,weshallstillbetterappreciatetheall-penetratinginfluenceofHellenicthought,158vying,asitdoes,withtheforcesofnatureinsubtletyanduniversaldiffusion.

WhiletheanalysisofHobbesgoesmuchdeeperthanAristotle’s,thegraspofhisreconstructivesynthesisiswiderandstrongerinatleastanequalproportion.Recognisingthegoodofthewholeasthesupremeruleofconduct,555hegivesanewinterpretationtotheparticularvirtues,anddisposesofthetheorywhichmadethemameanbetweentwoextremesnolesseffectuallythanhiscontemporarieshaddisposedofthesametheoryinitsapplicationtotheelementaryconstitutionofmatter.AndjustastheywereaidedintheirrevoltagainstAristotlebytherevivalofotherGreeksystems,soalsowashe.Theidentificationofjusticewithpublicinterest,thoughcommonlyattributedtoEpicurusalone,was,likematerialism,anideasharedbyhimwithStoicism,andwasprobablyimpressedonmodernthoughtbytheweightoftheirunitedauthority.AndwhenwefindthephilosopherofMalmesburymakingpublichappinessconsistinorderandtranquillity,wecannotbutthinkthatthiswasageneralisationfromtheStoicandEpicureanconceptionsofindividualhappiness;foritreproduces,underasocialform,thesameidealofpassionlessrepose.

Previoustohisforty-ninthyear,Plotinuswrotenothing.Atthatagehebegantocomposeshortessaysonsubjectswhichsuggestedthemselvesinthecourseofhisoralteaching.Duringthenexttenyears,heproducedtwenty-onesuch278papers,someofthemonlyapageortwoinlength.Attheendofthatperiod,hemadetheacquaintanceofhisfutureeditorandbiographer,Porphyry,ayoungstudentofSemiticextraction,whoseoriginalnamewasMalchus.Thetwosoonbecamefastfriends;andwhateverspeculativedifferencesatfirstdividedthemwerequicklyremovedbyanamicablecontroversybetweenPorphyryandanotherdisciplenamedAmelius,whichresultedintheunreservedadhesionoftheformertothedoctrineoftheircommonmaster.415TheliteraryactivityofPlotinusseemstohavebeenpowerfullystimulatedbyassociationwiththemoremethodicalmindofPorphyry.Duringthefiveyears416oftheirpersonalintercourseheproducednineteenessays,amountingaltogethertothreetimesthebulkoftheformerseries.Eightshorterpiecesfollowedduringtheperiodoffailinghealthwhichprecededhisdeath,PorphyrybeingatthattimeabsentinSicily,whitherhehadretiredwhensufferingfromthefitofdepressionalreadymentioned.

WhenwepassfromPlutarchtoMaximusTyriusandApuleius,thedarknessgrowsperceptiblythicker,andisnolongerbrokenbythelucidateladieiwithwhichtheThebanthinkerhadcombatedatleastoneclassofmistakenbeliefs.Thesewritersaresooccupiedwithdevelopingthepositiveaspectsofsupernaturalism—daemonology,divination,andthaumaturgy—thattheycanfindnoplaceforaprotestagainstitsextravagancesandperversions;noristheirmysticismbalancedbythoseextensiveapplicationsofphilosophyto255reallife,whetherundertheformofbiographyorofdiscoursesonpracticalmorality,whichenabledPlutarch’smindtopreserveanattitudeofcomparativesobrietyandcalmness.HencewhileMaximusisabsolutelyforgotten,andApuleiusrememberedonlyasanamusingstory-teller,PlutarchhasbeenperhapsthemostsuccessfulinterpreterbetweenGreekhumanityandmodernthought.Hispopularityisnowrapidlydeclining,buttheinfluenceexercisedbyhiswritingsoncharactersdifferingsomuchfromoneanotherandfromhisownasthoseofMontaigne,Rousseau,andWordsworth,sufficestoprove,ifanyproofbeneeded,howdeepandwidewerethesympathieswhichtheyonceevoked.

WearenowinapositiontounderstandthefullforceofDescartes’Cogitoergosum.Itexpressesthesubstantialityofself-consciousForm,theequalclaimofthoughtwithextensiontoberecognisedasanelementoftheuniverse.Thisrecognitionofself-consciousnessasthesurestrealitywas,indeed,farfrombeingnew.TheGreekScepticshadnevergonetothelengthofdoubtingtheirownpersonalexistence.Onthecontrary,theyprofessedasortofsubjectiveidealism.Refusingtogobeyondtheirownconsciousness,theyfoundinitsundisturbedself-possessiontheonlyabsolutesatisfactionthatlifecouldafford.Butknowledgeandrealityhadbecomesointimatelyassociatedwithsomethingindependentofmind,andminditselfwithamerereflectionofreality,thatthedenialofanexternalworld393seemedtothevulgaradenialofexistenceitself.AndalthoughAristotlehadfoundthehighest,ifnotthesoleabsoluteactualityinself-thinkingthought,heprojectedittosuchadistancefromhumanpersonalitythatitsbearingonthescepticalcontroversyhadpassedunperceived.Descartesbeganhisdemonstrationatthepointwherealltheancientsystemshadconverged,butfailedtodiscoverinwhatdirectiontheconditionsoftheproblemrequiredthattheyshouldbeprolonged.NomistakecanbegreaterthantoregardhimastheprecursorofGermanphilosophy.Thelatteroriginatedquiteindependentlyofhisteaching,thoughnotperhapsofhisexample,inthecombinationofamuchprofounderscepticismwithamuchwiderknowledgeofdogmaticmetaphysics.Hismethodistheveryreverseoftrueidealism.TheCogitoergosumisnotatakingupofexistenceintothought,butratheraconversionofthoughtintooneparticulartypeofexistence.Now,aswehaveseen,allotherexistencewasconceivedasextension,andhowevercarefullythoughtmightbedistinguishedfromthisasabsolutelyindivisible,itwasspeedilyreducedtothesamegeneralpatternofinclusion,limitation,andexpansion.WhereasKant,Fichte,andHegelafterwardsdweltontheformofthought,Descartesattendedonlytoitscontent,ortothatinwhichitwascontained.Inotherwords,hebeganbyconsideringnothowhethoughtbutwhathethoughtandwhenceitcame—hisideasandtheirsupposedderivationfromahighersphere.Take,forexample,histwogreatmethodsforprovingtheexistenceofGod.Wehaveinourmindstheideaofaperfectbeing—atleastDescartesprofessedtohavesuchanideainhismind,—andwe,asimperfectbeings,couldnothaveoriginateditforourselves.Itmust,therefore,havebeenplacedtherebyaperfectbeingactingonusfromwithout.Itisheretakenforgrantedthatthemechanicalequivalencebetweenmaterialeffectsandtheircausesmustobtaininaworldwherespatialrelations,andthereforemeasurement,arepresumably394unknown.And,secondly,existence,asaperfection,isinvolvedintheideaofaperfectbeing;thereforesuchabeingcanonlybeconceivedasexisting.Herethereseemstobeaconfusednotionthatbecausethepropertiesofageometricalfigurecanbededucedfromitsdefinition,thereforetheexistenceofsomethingmorethanasimpleideacanbededucedfromthedefinitionofthatideaitself.Butbesidesthemathematicalinfluence,therewasevidentlyaPlatonicinfluenceatwork;andoneisremindedofPlato’sargumentthatthesoulcannotdiebecauseitparticipatesintheideaoflife.SuchfallacieswereimpossiblesolongasAristotle’slogiccontinuedtobecarefullystudied,andtheygraduallydisappearedwithitsrevival.Meanwhilethecatwasaway,andthemiceusedtheiropportunity.

SofarAristotlegivesusapurelysuperficialandsensationalviewofthedrama.Yethecouldnothelpseeingthattherewasamoralelementintragedy,andhewasanxioustoshow,asagainstPlato,thatitexercisedanimprovingeffectontheaudience.TheresultishisfamoustheoryoftheCatharsis,solongmisunderstood,andnotcertainlyunderstoodevennow.TheobjectofTragedy,hetellsus,istopurify(orpurgeaway)pityandterrorbymeansofthoseemotionsthemselves.ThePoeticsseemsoriginallytohavecontainedanexplanationofthismysteriousutterance,nowlost,andcriticshaveendeavouredtosupplythegapbywritingeightytreatisesonthesubject.TheresulthasbeenatleasttoshowwhatAristotledidnotmean.Thepopularversionofhisdictum,whichisthattragedypurgesthepassionsbypityandterror,isclearlyinconsistentwiththewordingoftheoriginaltext.Pityandterrorareboththeobjectandtheinstrumentofpurification.Noryetdoeshemean,aswasoncesupposed,306thateachoftheseemotionsistocounterbalanceandmoderatetheother;forthiswouldimplythattheyareopposedtooneanother,whereasintheRhetorichespeaksofthemasbeingakin;whileaparallelpassageinthePolitics188showshimtohavebelievedthatthepassionsaresusceptibleofhomoeopathictreatment.Violententhusiasm,hetellsus,istobesoothedandcarriedoffbyastrainofexciting,impassionedmusic.Butwhencecomethepityandterrorwhicharetobedealtwithbytragicpoetry?Not,apparently,fromthepieceitself,fortoinoculatethepatientwithanewdisease,merelyforthesakeofcuringit,coulddohimnoimaginablegood.TojudgefromthepassageinthePoliticsalreadyreferredto,hebelievesthatpityandterrorarealwayspresentinthemindsofall,toacertainextent;andthetheoryapparentlyis,thattragedybringsthemtothesurface,andenablesthemtobethrownoffwithanaccompanimentofpleasurablefeeling.Now,ofcourse,wehaveaconstantcapacityforexperiencingeverypassiontowhichhumannatureisliable;buttosaythatintheabsenceofitsappropriateexternalstimulusweareeverperceptiblyandpainfullyaffectedbyanypassion,istoassertwhatisnottrueofanysanemind.And,evenwereitso,wereweconstantlyhauntedbyvaguepresentimentsofeviltoourselvesorothers,itisanythingbutclearthatfictitiousrepresentationsofcalamitywouldbetheappropriatemeansforenablingustogetridofthem.Zellerexplainsthatitistheinsightintouniversallawscontrollingourdestiny,theassociationofmisfortunewithadivinejustice,which,accordingtoAristotle,producesthepurifyingeffect;189butthiswouldbethepurgationofpityandterror,notbythemselves,butbytheintellectualframeworkinwhichtheyareset,theconcatenationofevents,theworkingsofcharacter,orthereferenceofeverythingtoaneternalcause.ThetruthisthatAristotle’sexplanationofthemoraleffectproducedbytragedyis307irrational,becausehiswholeconceptionoftragedyismistaken.Theemotionsexcitedbyitshighestformsarenotterrorandpity,butadmirationandlove,which,intheiridealexercise,aretooholyforpurification,toohighforrestriction,andtoodelightfulforrelief.

Fortunately,thedialecticmethodprovedstrongerthanitsowncreators,and,oncesetgoing,introducedfeelingsandex160periencesofwhichtheyhadneverdreamed,withinthehorizonofphilosophicconsciousness.Itwasfoundthatifwomenhadmuchtolearn,muchalsomightbelearnedfromthem.Theirwishescouldnotbetakenintoaccountwithoutgivingagreatlyincreasedprominenceintheguidanceofconducttosuchsentimentsasfidelity,purity,andpity;andtothatextentthereligionwhichtheyhelpedtoestablishhas,atleastinprinciple,leftnoroomforanyfurtherprogress.Ontheotherhand,itisonlybyreasonthatthemoreexclusivelyfeminineimpulsescanbefreedfromtheirprimitivenarrownessandelevatedintotrulyhumanemotions.Love,whenlefttoitself,causesmorepainthanpleasure,forthewordsoftheoldidylstillremaintruewhichassociateitwithjealousyascruelasthegrave;pity,withoutprevision,createsmoresufferingthanitrelieves;andblindfidelityisinstinctivelyopposedeventothemostbeneficentchanges.WearestillsufferingfromtheexcessivepreponderancewhichCatholicismgavetotheideasofwomen;butweneednotlistentothosewhotellusthatthevariedexperiencesofhumanitycannotbeorganisedintoarational,consistent,self-supportingwhole.

文章推荐:

虞城05月份天气虞城05月份气温虞城2020年05月份历史天气

老板拒付员工血汗钱不知去向 警方介入终自首

重庆市垫江县:“全域化”构建“大党建”“小县城”推进城市基层党建工作初探

海兴05月份天气海兴05月份气温海兴2020年05月份历史天气

澳大利亚将开启全球人才计划 吸引优秀技术移民

隆回05月份天气隆回05月份气温隆回2020年05月份历史天气

[农村大市场] 踏春问茶(二)

网友评论

  • 雨花郡主MIUQ5

    VI.

     Itisinterestingtoobservehow,herealso,thepositivescienceoftheagehadalargeshareindeterminingitsphilosophiccharacter.Foundedonthediscoveryoftheearth’strueshape,Aristotle’smetaphysicshadbeenoverthrownbythediscoveryoftheearth’smotion.AndnowtheclaimsofCartesianismtohavefurnishedanexactknowledgeofmatterandadefinitionofitwhenceallthefactsofobservationcouldbededucedàpriori,weresummarilyrefutedbythediscovery421ofuniversalgravitation.TheCartesianscomplainedthatNewtonwasbringingbacktheoccultqualitiesoftheSchoolmen;butthetendencyofbodiestomovetowardsoneanotherprovedascertainasitwasinexplicablymysterious.Foratime,thestudyofcauseswassupersededbythestudyoflaws;andthenewmethodofphysicalsciencemovedinperfectharmonywiththephenomenismofLocke.OnemostimportantconsequenceofthisrevolutionwastoplacethenewCriticalphilosophyonafootingquitedifferentfromthatoccupiedbytheancientsceptics.Bothrestrictedcertainknowledgetoourownstatesofconsciousness;butitnowappearedthatthismightbedonewithoutimpeachingthevalueofacceptedscientificconclusions,whichwasmorethantheAcademicphilosophywouldhaveadmitted.Inotherwords,grantingthatwewerelimitedtophenomena,itwasshownthatscienceconsistedinascertainingtherelationsofthesephenomenatooneanother,insteadoftoaproblematicrealitylyingbehindthem;while,thatsuchrelationsexistedandwere,infact,partofthephenomenathemselves,waswhatnoscepticcouldeasilydeny.

  • 雪灵芝yyByn

    ItseemsstrangethatGalileo,havinggonesofar,didnotgoastepfurther,andperceivethattheplanetaryorbits,beingcurvilinear,mustresultfromthecombinationofacentripetalwithatangentialforce.Butthetruthisthatheneverseemstohavegraspedhisownlawofinertiainitsfullgenerality.Heunderstoodthattheplanetscouldnothavebeensetinmotionwithoutarectilinearimpulse;buthisideawasthatthisimpulsecontinuedonlysolongaswasnecessaryinordertogivethemtheirpresentvelocity,insteadofactingonthemforeverasatangentialforce.TheexplanationofthisstrangeinconsequencemustbesoughtinasurvivalofAristotelianconceptions,inthepersistentbeliefthatrectilinearmotionwasnecessarilylimitedandtemporary,whilecircularmotionwasnatural,perfect,andeternal.548Nowsuchconceptionsas386Nature,perfection,andeternityalwaysrebelagainstananalysisofthephenomenawhereintheyaresupposedtoreside.ThesameprejudicewillexplainwhyGalileoshouldhavesopersistentlyignoredKepler’sLaws,forwecanhardlyimaginethattheywerenotbroughtunderhisnotice.

  • 如萱紫儿AMwvn

    perpetual;asbeseemeth

  • 但法国8cIGx

     

  • 大笨蛋nAaAq

    v

  • 扒皮成71GUF

    WehaveseenhowtheideaofNature,firstevolvedbyphysicalphilosophy,wastakenbysome,atleast,amongtheSophistsasabasisfortheirethicalteaching;thenhowaninterpretationutterlyopposedtotheirswasputonitbypracticalmen,andhowthissecondinterpretationwassogeneralisedbytheyoungerrhetoriciansastoinvolvethedenialofallmoralitywhatever.Meanwhile,anotherequallyimportantconception,destinedtocomeintospeedyandprolongedantagonismwiththeideaofNature,andlikeittoexerciseapowerfulinfluenceonethicalreflection,hadalmostcontemporaneouslybeenelaboratedoutofthematerialswhichearlierspeculationsupplied.FromParmenidesandHeracleitusdown,everyphilosopherwhohadpropoundedatheoryoftheworld,hadalsomoreorlessperemptorilyinsistedonthefactthathistheorydifferedwidelyfromcommonbelief.Thosewhoheldthatchangeis86impossible,andthosewhotaughtthateverythingisincessantlychanging;thosewhoassertedtheindestructibilityofmatter,andthosewhodenieditscontinuity;thosewhotookawayobjectiverealityfromeveryqualityexceptextensionandresistance,andthosewhoaffirmedthatthesmallestmoleculespartookmoreorlessofeveryattributethatisrevealedtosense—allthese,howevermuchtheymightdisagreeamongthemselves,agreedindeclaringthatthereceivedopinionsofmankindwereanutterdelusion.Thus,asharpdistinctioncametobedrawnbetweenthemisleadingsense-impressionsandtheobjectiverealitytowhichthoughtalonecouldpenetrate.Itwasbycombiningthesetwoelements,sensationandthought,thattheideaofmindwasoriginallyconstituted.Andmindwhensounderstoodcouldnotwellbeaccountedforbyanyofthematerialistichypothesesatfirstproposed.Thesensesmustdifferprofoundlyfromthatofwhichtheygivesuchanunfaithfulreport;whilereason,whichAnaxagorashadsocarefullydifferentiatedfromeveryotherformofexistence,carriedbackitsdistinctiontothesubjectivesphere,andbecameclothedwithanewspiritualitywhenreintegratedintheconsciousnessofman.

     

  • 草莓果sZXsT

    Ithadbeenurgedagainsthedonismthatpleasureisaprocess,amovement;whereasthesupremegoodmustbeacompletedproduct—anendinwhichwecanrest.Againstsensualenjoymentsinparticular,ithadbeenurgedthattheyarecausedbythesatisfactionofappetite,and,assuch,mustresultinamerenegativecondition,markingthezeropointofpleasurablesentiency.Finally,muchstresshadbeenlaidontheanti-socialandsuicidalconsequencesofthatselfishgraspingatpowertowhichhabitsofunlimitedself-indulgencemustinfalliblylead.TheformgiventohedonismbyEpicurusisareactionagainstthesecriticisms,amodificationimposedonitforthepurposeofevadingtheirforce.Heseemstoadmitthatbodilysatisfactionisrathertheremovalofawant,andconsequentlyofapain,thanasourceofpositivepleasure.Buttheresultingconditionofliberationfromuneasinessis,accordingtohim,allthatwecandesire;andbyextendingthesameprincipletoeveryothergood,heindirectlybringsbackthementalfelicitywhichatfirstsighthissystemthreatenedeithertoexcludeortoreducetoamereshadowofsensualenjoyment.For,incalculatingtheelementsofunhappiness,wehavetodeal,notonlywithpresentdiscomfort,butalso,andtoafargreaterextent,withtheapprehensionoffutureevil.Wedreadthelossofworldlygoods,offriends,ofreputation,oflifeitself.Wearecontinuallyexposedtopain,bothfromviolenceandfromdisease.Wearehauntedbyvisionsofdivinevengeance,bothhereandhereafter.Togetridofallsuchterrors,topossessoursoulsinpeace,isthehighestgood—apermanent,asdistinguishedfromatransientstateofconsciousness—andtheproperbusinessofphilosophyistoshowushowthatconsummationmaybeattained.65Thuswearebroughtbacktothatblissfulself-contemplationofmindwhichAristotlehadalreadydeclaredtobethegoalofallendeavourandthesolehappinessofGod.

     

  • 绿卡纸3RCV2

     

标签列表